O
Milwaukee
← Community
Public SafetyCommunity discussion

Duty to intervene with federal agents

Milwaukee

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (3)Opposed (1)

At a glance

Public comments
4
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 11, 2026.

Public comments (4)

SupportiveChristine Newman-OrtizJun 11, 2026

Voces de la Frontera's director strongly supported the motion, citing militarized ICE operations, deaths of immigrants, and the need for local constitutional guardrails.

PUBLIC SAFETY AND HEALTH COMMITTEE — June 11, 2026 · 2:21:34 →
SupportiveEmilio De TorreJun 11, 2026

Milwaukee Turners' director supported the motion, citing Wisconsin's duty-to-intervene law and the killing of Sam Sharp by out-of-state officers.

PUBLIC SAFETY AND HEALTH COMMITTEE — June 11, 2026 · 2:25:00 →
SupportiveWalter LanierJun 11, 2026

Pastor of Progressive Baptist Church supported the motion, saying local bodies must decide what kind of city Milwaukee will be amid federal overreach.

PUBLIC SAFETY AND HEALTH COMMITTEE — June 11, 2026 · 2:28:18 →
OpposedAlexander AyalaJun 11, 2026

Milwaukee Police Association president opposed the motion, arguing officers can't know other agencies' use-of-force policies and risk federal arrest for intervening.

PUBLIC SAFETY AND HEALTH COMMITTEE — June 11, 2026 · 2:32:06 →