O
Milwaukee
← Community
Public SafetyCommunity discussion

Duty to intervene SOP

Milwaukee

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (2)

At a glance

Public comments
2
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed May 21, 2026.

Public comments (6)

SupportiveOmar BarberenaMay 21, 2026

Speaking for Voces de la Frontera, he strongly supported the resolution protecting residents from aggressive ICE tactics, citing profiling, assault, and constitutional violations by ICE and CBP.

FIRE AND POLICE COMMISSION — May 21, 2026 · 4:00 →
SupportiveRyan ClancyMay 21, 2026

The state representative said Chief Norman refused to commit to holding ICE accountable for law violations and called the legislation necessary but embarrassing to need.

FIRE AND POLICE COMMISSION — May 21, 2026 · 9:04 →
SupportiveAnn RitcheyMay 21, 2026

She supported applying the same use-of-force standards to outside federal agencies and preferred Substitute B's duty-to-investigate language.

FIRE AND POLICE COMMISSION — May 21, 2026 · 12:06 →
SupportiveBruce WigginsMay 21, 2026

He supported the previous speakers and asked whether the resolution would protect voting rights in fall elections; it does not.

FIRE AND POLICE COMMISSION — May 21, 2026 · 14:45 →
SupportiveAmy DonahueMay 21, 2026

She added her support for an SOP that would protect Milwaukee from ICE operations.

FIRE AND POLICE COMMISSION — May 21, 2026 · 16:21 →
SupportiveJim CarpenterMay 21, 2026

The Peace Action co-chair urged the Commission to take a moral stand against ICE, citing the abduction of a local resident and calling on MPD to protect everyone.

FIRE AND POLICE COMMISSION — May 21, 2026 · 17:06 →